Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backports for 1.11.2 #17675

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

mr-c
Copy link
Contributor

@mr-c mr-c commented Aug 14, 2024

Backports for a 1.11.2 release, as suggested in #17285 (comment)

Cherry-picked from #17638, #17639, and #17637

ilevkivskyi and others added 3 commits August 14, 2024 15:48
It is unfortunate to add two extra slots to a common type (and I guess
this is why it was rejected in the original PR), but all other
alternatives I tried are hacky and/or dangerous. So, this is a price to
pay for introducing a new type syntax.

---------

Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

Diff from mypy_primer, showing the effect of this PR on open source code:

prefect (https://github.com/PrefectHQ/prefect)
- src/prefect/artifacts.py:45: error: Method cannot have explicit self annotation and Self type  [misc]

@hauntsaninja
Copy link
Collaborator

Superseded by #17677

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants